Select your company in a TRM or custom peer group to see document maturity.
Overall Grade: —
Organizational Practices Benchmarking
Select your company and a peer group to see how documented HR and governance practices compare — grades, gaps, and disclosure strengths.
Peers in Group
—
Select a peer group
Your Percentile
—
vs. selected peer group
Strongest Pillar
—
—
Biggest Gap
—
—
Document Maturity Overview
Your company vs. peer group median across TRM document pillars
Peer Comparison
Document-based grades and disclosure themes · click column headers to sort
| Company | Overall Grade | Strengths | Opportunities | Market Cap | Industry | Primary Office |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading peer comparison… | ||||||
Employee Survey Benchmarks
Sample data · Phase 2Illustrative HR practice survey results. Not connected to live assessment data yet. Employee survey filters (industry, size, region, year) will ship when the benchmark API is available.
Goal Setting
C
When are company goals typically communicated to employees
relative to the annual performance period?
2-3 months after the start of the performance period
Industry Benchmark (Technology, Medium Companies)
Before the start of the performance period
45%
Within the first month of the performance period
32%
2-3 months after the start of the performance period
15%
3-4 months after the performance period start
6%
>4 months after the performance period start
2%
Insight
Your timing puts you in the bottom 23% of peers. Best practice
companies communicate goals before or within the first month
of the performance period.
Are employees expected to have written goals?
Yes
Industry Benchmark (Technology, Medium Companies)
Yes
84%
No
12%
Unsure
4%
Strength
You're aligned with 84% of technology companies who require
written goals. This is considered a best practice.
Describe the sign-off and approval process for employee goals.
There's a systematic approval (e.g., within a system a manager
needs to 'approve' the goals to make them live or mark them as
final)
Industry Benchmark (Technology, Medium Companies)
There's no systematic approval
27%
There's a systematic approval process
73%
Strength
Your systematic approval process aligns with 73% of peer
companies and demonstrates strong goal governance.
Formal training and review process exists to ensure goals are
written in a high quality fashion (e.g., SMART goals or other
framework).
There's no formal review process to ensure goals are written /
documented in a high quality fashion
Industry Benchmark (Technology, Medium Companies)
No formal review process exists
38%
A formal process exists to ensure high quality goals
62%
Opportunity
62% of peers have formal goal quality processes. Consider
implementing SMART goal training to improve goal
effectiveness.
Performance Reviews
B
How many formal performance review meetings did you have with
your manager in the last 12 months?
2
Industry Benchmark (Technology, Medium Companies)
0
8%
1
22%
2
35%
3
18%
4
12%
More than 4
5%
Good Practice
Having 2 formal reviews annually puts you in the majority
(35%) and above companies with just 1 review. Consider
quarterly reviews for even better performance management.
Feedback & Development
C-
How frequently do you receive informal feedback from your
manager?
Monthly
Industry Benchmark (Technology, Medium Companies)
Weekly
28%
Bi-weekly
22%
Monthly
31%
Quarterly
14%
Rarely/Never
5%
Room for Improvement
Monthly feedback is good, but 50% of high-performing companies
provide weekly or bi-weekly feedback. More frequent feedback
drives better performance.