Six pillars · A to F · Independent

Your company already has a grade.

Goal setting, feedback, leveling, ratings, calibration and performance tooling — graded A to F from public evidence, whether or not the company takes part. Verified employee reports correct the record. Look up your employer, then read the receipts behind the grade.

Company profiles and the Pulse are open to everyone. Your own organization's internal audit is by invitation.

performance.fyi/company/meta

Profile

Meta

C
Clear criteria for advancement, but employees report inconsistency in how the rubric is applied across teams. Calibration sessions can lead to variations in assessment.
Confidence
High
Submissions
5

01 / Open grade ledger

Browse the grades. No sign-up.

All companies →
Company
Goals
Fdbk
Level
Rating
Calib
Tools
Overall

Autonomous grades are produced from public evidence and are opinions, not statements of fact. Employee-reported grades aggregate verified assessment responses.

Overall weighs full public-evidence coverage (TRM composite), not a pillar average. Pillar cells show the TRM4 signal read; — means public evidence is insufficient to grade that pillar.

02 / Inside the platform

This is what you get after you sign in.

Three screens do most of the work: the pillar drilldown where employees compare notes, the integrity dashboard that scores the system as designed against the system as experienced, and the report your leadership team actually reads.

performance.fyi/company/meta/leveling

Leveling

C
Take survey

Insights

Clear criteria for advancement, but employees report inconsistency in application across teams. The leveling guide is well documented, though calibration sessions can lead to variations in assessment.
Confidence
High
Submissions
5
19 Comments
26 mins ago
Promotion criteria are published, but two orgs read the same rubric differently.
2 days ago
Ask about the distribution target before you accept the band.
performance.fyi/dashboard
Integrity Dashboard Live
As designed As experienced
Performance Alpha
+6.2
Integrity Delta
−17.8
performance.fyi/reports/grade-report
Grade Intelligence Report
Meta Platforms
Technology · Performance.FYI
C
Overall performance management grade
Rigorous on paper, uneven in calibration
Source: autonomous (TRM signal model)
PillarAutonomousEmployeeSpread
Integrity flag: a two-grade gap on calibration typically indicates process-versus-experience divergence worth investigating.

03 / Method

Two engines, one A to F scale.

01

Autonomous grading (TRM)

Grades built from public evidence: policy pages, filings, disclosed process documentation and digital footprint. Works before a single employee participates, which is what makes peer benchmarking possible.

02

Internal assessment

Structured input from employees and administrators, scored on a dual-perspective model: the process leadership designed versus the experience people actually live. The gap shows where to focus first.

03

Auditable, not a black box

Every grade carries a scoring trace and a confidence level, and tiers down transparently when public evidence is thin. Built to survive a board conversation, not just a slide.

04 / Free diagnostic

Grade your own employer in five minutes.

Ten questions about how goals, feedback and ratings actually work where you work. You get an instant pillar-level read, with no email and no sign-up, and your answers sharpen the public grade.

Take the Pulse →
10Questions
5Minutes
0Sign-ups required

Currently by invitation

Want your company audited, not just graded?

Internal audits run with a small group of operators, HR leaders and boards while the methodology hardens: dual-perspective assessments, the integrity dashboard, and a board-ready report. Request access and we reply personally.

Request access